Is Work Something You Do? Or a Place You Go?

What should it be? I was intrigued by Trista Harris’ blog post on flexible work environments and generational change. Check out Tactical Philanthropy. What value does being in a stuffy conference room or windowless cubicle from 9-5 have? I’m not saying that it has no value, certainly it builds community, promotes collaboration, and customer service expectations certainly need to be in place.

Does it matter if I do my best work from 10pm-2am and would rather sleep later or take my kids to school in the morning? If the work gets done (and some would argue that it’s done better or more efficiently) does it matter if I’m in the office? I do think that there are responsible people who can manage their schedule and their work appropriately, and be supervised from afar, and I only hope that those who abuse it don’t ruin it for everyone else. It’s about hiring the right people - or getting the right people on the bus (Jim Collins) - and I think this could be interesting?

Is it the immediate future of the sector? Probably not, but I think when the Gen X and Y’ers predominately lead the field, we will see some changes.

Submitted by Allison Treppa

Close to Home (and Work)

The Boston Globe today posted an interesting article “Finding Ways to Give Where You Work and Live”. Core to the mission of MNA, we aim to increase service where we live, work and learn. The organization in the article, Building Impact, puts this mission into action. They bring service projects and volunteerism right into the heart of office and apartment buildings. How easy is that?

This approach reduces the excuses (maybe that’s what I need anyway). The excuses of “I didn’t know about it”, “I couldn’t get there”, “I don’t have time”. If you barely have to venture outside your apartment to make a difference in your community, why wouldn’t you? I know I’m craving a sense of community and I would love to see this here. Maybe it’s my generation, maybe it’s just me, but service is a way to connect to others and a way of life - nothing like bringing it right home.

Submitted by Allison Treppa

The Future Will Be Different

Last summer, over 100 nonprofit emerging leaders gathered to discuss upcoming issues in the nonprofit sector. This event will stay with me for a long while, I was energized and excited by my colleagues across the state and nation who will lead the sector long into the future (and many who are leading organizations now). It felt like such a release - a release of frustration and emotion among people who could understand exactly what I was going though.

If you missed the event, or just want a reminder of what happened and the discussions, check out the GVSU Johnson Center’s report NP2020: Issues and Answers from the Next Generation.

Submitted by Allison Treppa

Stanford Social Innovation Review

The Stanford Social Innovation Review recently posted their Top 5 blogs of 2007. Check out the links below.

Philanthropy Doesn’t Care About Black People
Rosetta Thurman on diversity (or lack therof) in philanthropy
The October 18 issue of the Chronicle of Philanthropy confirmed what we in the nonprofit sector already knew: the nonprofit and philanthropic sector doesn’t do a very good job at this thing called diversity. Though the foundation world would have us believe that much progress is being made with the emergence of giving circles and donor communities of color, the reality is that it’s high time for the nonprofit sector to put race on the table. In fact, I titled this post as such because the expanded, cop-out definitions of diversity that include gender, religion, disability, and sexual orientation allow organizations to avoid the topic of race and pay lip service to the issue instead of making real cultural changes.

Lose the Marketing Department
Jeff Brooks on the role of marketing departments in the social sector
The marketing department is destroying your organization. Not on purpose, but the very fact that marketing is segregated into a department is what’s doing the damage. It doesn’t matter how smart (or lacking in smarts) your marketing department is. If marketing isn’t built into your entire organization from top to bottom and side to side, you’re lost.

The Four Fundamental Questions of Philanthropy
Albert Ruesga on how to decide what to do with $600,000,000
The Ford Foundation, the second largest foundation on the planet, with assets of $12 billion, is about to hire a new CEO. What will the new CEO do with all that money? How, among all the possibilities available to her, will she decide to focus the foundation’s grantmaking? The new CEO will want to honor the foundation’s previous commitments. She won’t want to make any sudden moves. But having exercised the necessary prudence, and having consulted her board, toward what star will she steer her course?

Marketing to Donors
Perla Ni on incorporating marketing into nonprofit fundraising
Ideas that spread win. Period. This is true for nonprofits, politics, and business, said Seth Godin. Sliced bread was invented in 1913 by Otto Frederick Rohwedder. He took out a patent, built a factory, and waited for the orders to come in. Well, not many orders came in. It wasn’t until 1930 when Wonder Bread started packaging and marketing pre-sliced bread that it became a success, said Godin. This was one of the entertaining and enlightening examples of marketing successes and flops that Seth Godin presented at a fantastic one-day seminar that I recently attended. Seth Godin is a marketing guru, author of books like the Purple Cow and founder of www.squidoo.com, a Wikipedia-like community that raises money for charity. His seminars in New York are targeted at both for-profits and nonprofits.

The Patina of Philanthropy
Mark Rosenman on the costs of Product (RED)
The Product (RED) campaign tells us that by shopping, we can help Africa cope with HIV/AIDS. In reality, it’s just one more example of the corporate world aligning its operations with its central purpose of increasing shareholder profit, except this time it is being cloaked in the patina of philanthropy. Buy a (RED) product and a portion of the purchase price goes to charity. But there is a question about what charities will lose in the long term.

Submitted by Robin Lynn Grinnell

Habitat for Humanity Reflections

Former MNA President and CEO Sam Singh recently completed a project with the Habitat for Humanity Global Village program. Check out his video reflection:

Submitted by Sam Singh
Sam Singh is an affiliated consultant with the Lansing-based firm, Public Policy Associates. He currently is on sabbatical traveling the world. You can contact Sam at singhsam94@gmail.com

Strategic Restructuring… What We’re Seeing In Our Town

As part of Nonprofit Alliance’s mission to strengthen and support an effective nonprofit sector in the Battle Creek area, we were fortunate to be able to bring Bob Harrington (LaPiana Associates, Inc) to our community last year to dive into Strategic Restructuring (SR) and what that could mean in our town.

We all know nonprofits are increasingly learning to work together in new and different ways, but what SR has brought to our community is a process that can help folks think about, examine and plan for these new relationships. Taking this time up front can really pay off.

Maybe you have seen this scenario first-hand – two organizations decide to hurry through a merger process without proper guidance or support, perhaps due to some pending emergency. They surface from this “incomplete” process with too many unaddressed questions, or worse yet… a realization that they just spent a lot of time and resources to find out that they were not a good fit from the start.

I think one of the biggest impacts the SR process is having on our community is that it is helping nonprofits come to the table by choice. They are starting to see strategic alliances as just that… part of their strategy to best serve the community and not just a way out of some turmoil they find themselves in.

I’m not saying the SR process is easy - negotiations can be emotional and long. But handled properly organizations can emerge from the process not only stronger and more efficient, but also in a better position to positively impact their community for lasting change.

And… isn’t that what we’re all really working for anyway?

Submitted by Kimberlee Andrews, Program Manager with the Nonprofit Alliance in Battle Creek

IAVE - International Conference, Panama City

Last summer, I began to let my national network of nonprofit colleagues know my plans for my international journey. Kathleen Dennis, a friend and work colleague from my first job out of college, immediately asked if I wanted to speak at an International conference she was helping plan in Panama. I immediately accepted and now 10 months later I find myself in Panama City. I will be part of a panel on International Youth Volunteerism tomorrow morning.

I attended the morning session on ethics and values in international volunteer movements. The session was presented by speakers both in Spanish and English. I was surprised how much my Spanish has improved because I did understand much more than I thought I would. The speakers were passionate about the issue. One speaker highlighted IAVE´s Universal Declaration on Volunteerism and the other on professional ethics and certification of volunteer administrators.

I wanted to share one paragraph from the Declaration. The full declaration can be found at http://www.volunteernow.org.nz/article/3.

“In this era of globalization and continuous change, the world is becoming smaller, more interdependent, and more complex. Volunteering - either through individual or group action - is a way in which:

* Human values of community, caring, and serving can be sustained and strengthened;
* Individuals can exercise their rights and responsibilities as members of communities, while learning and growing throughout their lives, realizing their full human potential; and
* Connections can be made across differences that push us apart so that we can live together in healthy, sustainable communities, working together to provide innovative solutions to our shared challenges and to shape our collective destinies.”

Just as it did when I presented my workshop in Nigeria, it felt good to be back in a work environment. The discussion of issues and the presentation of solutions were rich. It was why I enjoyed working in the sector. There are at least ten people here who I know well from my time serving on a few national boards. Though the cost was a little higher than I anticipated to get here, I am now excited about the next few days of learning and networking.

Submitted by Sam Singh
Sam Singh is an affiliated consultant with the Lansing-based firm, Public Policy Associates. He currently is on sabbatical traveling the world. You can contact Sam at singhsam94@gmail.com

More Than Just Mergers

On April 29 and 30, MNA is bringing Bob Harrington (LaPiana Associates, Inc) back to Michigan. His topic? Strategic Restructuring (SR). April 29 is a full day overview for consultants, April 30 is a half-day introduction for nonprofits. You can get more information about the training on our website, and more information on strategic restructuring at http://www.lapiana.org/sr/index.html

It’s funny to talk to most nonprofit folks about “Strategic Restructuring.” Many people think it’s a clever way to hide the word “merger.” I won’t lie – merger may be part of it – but Strategic Restructuring is really about partnership: specifically, identifying the appropriate level of partnership(s) for your nonprofit business model. SR outlines a broad range of options by which nonprofits can increase efficiency and effectiveness. Sometimes merger is the answer, sometimes it isn’t. Sometimes back room consolidation is the answer, sometimes it isn’t. Sometimes a very specific project collaboration is the answer… You get the picture.

The fact is, nonprofits have options – but often don’t know what those options entail. LaPiana Associates’ Strategic Restructuring model is a direct and concise approach to planning and decision making. In today’s nonprofit environment we have no choice but to think differently – and this is the place to start.

Submitted by Robin Lynn Grinnell

Flickr Donation for Nonprofits at TechSoup.org

One of the best ways to tell your nonprofit’s story is through pictures. Images of your big event as well as the community and people you serve, can help make your mission real to the rest of us (including potential donors). The great news for nonprofits with pictures to share is that Flickr, the online application that lets you share; organize; and discuss photos, is now offering free Pro accounts to any nonprofit for one year. A Pro account lets you upload more photos and create more sets of photos than a free account, so I really recommend upgrading to a Pro account (okay, there is a small admin fee, but it’s cheaper than full price).

Another recommendation is that once you go through the donation process, setup your account with your organization’s name as your account name. This way, the URL to your Flickr site will be “http://www.Flickr.com/YourNonprofitName” - which helps people find and remember your site.

To get the donation, you need to be registered at TechSoup.org. If you need to register (and I highly recommend that you do – there are loads of similar discounts and free software!) check out TechSoup’s Getting Started Guide, otherwise go straight to the Flickr donation page.

Submitted by Adam King

We Talk a Good Game

As nonprofits we talk a good game. Everyone is talking (or writing) about how business, governments and nonprofits will have to compete for the upcoming talent of the younger generations - and is there really enough committed leaders willing and able to continue the important work of the sector? We discuss the leadership deficit with intelligence and worry that our organizations will not be left in capable hands upon our departure. But is it all talk?

I loved this opinion piece in the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Is there really a shortage of talent? Or is there a shortage of talent in the way that Baby Boomers and Gen X’ers perceive talent? Maybe the difference is that current nonprofit leaders are unsettled about the idea of turning over their organizations to others with different ways of getting things done.

Submitted by Allison Treppa