Mackinac Policy Conference Review

Last week, the Detroit Chamber of Commerce held its annual Mackinac Policy Conference at the Grand Hotel on Mackinac Island. Donna Murray-Brown and I were fortunate enough to attend the conference this year on behalf of MNA. One difference in the conference this year, was the lack of lawmakers. Michigan legislators stayed behind in Lansing to put the finishing touches on the FY’12-13 state budget.

This year’s theme was on making Michigan and Detroit a place for global competitiveness. To help attendees think about Michigan in a global setting, the Detroit Chamber had two very high-profile foreign affairs experts, Fareed Zakaria and Thomas Friedman. Both had very similar messages, Michigan and the United States can no longer think of itself as the sole “super power” on the global stage – both in foreign policy and economic progress. Both Zakaria and Friedman came to the same recommendations, improve US infrastructure (including wireless deployment), open up immigration policy, and invest in K-16 education. Detroit Public Television has both sessions on their website, you can view each of them here.

Fareed Zakaria and Thomas Friedman were not the only ones touting the need for Michigan to invest in the future. Numerous keynote speakers and panelists also reiterated the point: if Michigan is going to succeed, it must invest in the future.

One slightly low point of the conference was the “Fab Five” panel, where the leaders of Macomb, Oakland, Wayne, and Washtenaw counties, and Detroit Mayor, David Bing discussed regional collaboration. There was much more of the usual bickering around turf and who should pay for what, instead of broader discussion of a vision of what regionalism looks like for the Detroit area, which would have built upon what the other keynote speakers proposed. There is always next year…

 

Submitted by Christina Kuo, Senior Director of Public Policy and Public Affairs, Michigan Nonprofit Association

Despite differences, education is central to both State and Federal Budgets

These past few weeks have demonstrated the challenges of creating sound, effective budgets at the state and national level. The Michigan and federal budgets, however, paint two very different pictures of the health of their constituents.

The recession over the past four years has not been kind, but there seems to be a glimmer of hope in Michigan. After several consecutive years of painful cuts, it appears the financial outlook is more optimistic with 2012’s budget surplus. Education funding increased by 0.2%, public safety funding is also set to increase, and the “Rainy Day” fund will grow by an additional $130 million, according to the State Budget Office. At the Federal level, by contrast, the deficit still weighs heavily on programs most Americans take for granted, but rely on – the President offered a 52% decrease in Education, a 35% decrease in Labor, and slight increases for Health and Human Services (3.7%) and the Corporation of National and Community Service (1.3%).

Still, there are some common commitments between the two budgets, such as improving performance and affordability of education. President Obama promotes a ‘Race to the Top’ and links financial aid to universities that keep their tuition under control. Governor Rick Snyder also wants to link increased spending in education to improved performance, best practices, and college tuition restraint. And they are politicians from two different parties.

Despite the other differing priorities of the two budgets, it is clear that superior education for future generations must be a priority for education beyond high school. Whether it is community college, traditional four-year, or vocational – higher education has become increasingly important to achieve personal financial security.

Submitted by Michelle Eichhorst, Public Policy Fellow for Michigan Nonprofit Association

Nonprofits Ready to Partner

Wednesday night, Governor Snyder gave his second State of the State address. As he talked about how far Michigan has moved forward in 2011, and his Administration’s priorities for 2012, he continually came back to two key ideas: collaboration and innovation. Collaboration brings with it a sense of community, inclusion, and hope for the future. With innovation, Michigan can creatively improve upon what is already great or throw out the bad. These are indeed keys to a successful future in Michigan and keystones to the good governance Gov. Snyder also advocates.

But you can’t talk about collaboration with just these two sectors (business and government) while ignoring the impact of nonprofits on many of the metrics on the MiDashboard. By including nonprofits at the table of this discussion from the beginning, alongside elected officials and businesses, Gov. Snyder would not only see a broader, more complete view of the impacts of his proposals, but also a better solution to the problems he has identified.

While Snyder’s agenda was positive and avoided controversy, he can no longer ignore the growing importance of nonprofits that are integral to achieving many of his goals for 2012. By championing his own values of collaboration and innovation, the state, nonprofits, and other key players can work together to achieve the desired results of a healthy and prosperous Michigan.

Submitted by Michelle Eichhorst, Public Policy Fellow for Michigan Nonprofit Association

Small Steps

Many advocates wonder if their efforts are making a difference. Those of us in the engagement business often measure success by the number of individuals who take action or by the various laws or policies that are changed as a result of our mobilization efforts. Then there are times when success is measured by what doesn’t happen or by extremely small, but extremely important, steps.

Making changes to Michigan’s redistricting process is one of those difficult mobilization efforts for which successful actions may be difficult to realize. The Michigan Redistricting Collaborative has been working hard to ensure that lawmakers seek the input of the public as the lines for voting districts are redrawn. A decade ago, lawmakers were working in private conference rooms to cut deals and draw maps to secretly preserve incumbencies among both Republicans and Democrats. Once finished, the maps were hastily passed through both chambers of the Michigan Legislature, quickly signed into law, and even debated in court filings before the entire process and map formulas became public.

Ten years later the overall process remains the same. The Legislature gets to draw its own maps provided it remains within the general rules laid forth by the Michigan Constitution, Michigan Supreme Court cases and those requirements provided for by the Voting Rights Act. Within these boundaries, demographers are helping politicians privately pick their constituents. Members of both parties are working behind the scenes to ensure they are not drawn out of their own district or pitted against a challenger in their own party.

And yet, we know this prior to the final decisions on the district lines, albeit barely before the critical votes. Many of my colleagues involved in the Michigan Redistricting Collaborative are frustrated by the lack of change in the system, the haste with which the Legislature and the Governor are moving to dispense this “insider’s game,” and the general lack of interest by the public in the dysfunctional nature of our Redistricting process in Michigan. So you ask, what did all our work accomplish? We accomplished what we asked our lawmakers to do: we increased the transparency of one of the most covert, public processes in Michigan.

At www.DrawtheLineMichigan.org you can see the media traffic over the past two months as lawmakers were asked how the maps would be drawn, what input the public would have on the process, which lawmakers would be making the decisions, and what the impact would be on vulnerable populations. Read the quotes from the leadership in the House and Senate where Senate Majority Leader Richardville and House Speaker Bolger were asked to explain how public comment would be sought and how this time, the process would be different. Look at the work that individual citizens did to draw their own maps using the common electronic media and public information tools available to anyone.

This week we will see quick passage of the legislation that will define the voting boundaries for Michiganders for the next ten years. While many may not like either the outcome or the process used, we can take solace in knowing that we brought the process into the light and injected the important principles of transparency, citizen engagement, competitive districts, and fairness into the debate over redistricting. These small victories may not be what many had hoped for in helping to form our more perfect union, but it’s an important start.


Submitted by Kyle Caldwell, president and CEO, for the Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

Proposed Cuts Would Undermine Nonprofit Sector’s Work

The status of the state budget in Michigan has been a hot issue over the last few weeks, as legislators work to create a balanced budget. While we know that some cuts are inevitable and that shared sacrifice is important, the proposed budget cuts to the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the total elimination of charitable tax credits will have a negative impact on the nonprofit sector as a whole.

If funding for the Michigan Community Service Commission is zeroed out, as the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee for the Department of Human Services proposed, Michigan risks losing $13.3 million in federal funds that are leveraged by MCSC. The elimination of MCSC’s budget, a total of $675,000 per fiscal year, is not worth losing those federal funds – the math simply does not make sense. MCSC brings money into Michigan while providing important services for the community, like placing more than 1,200 AmeriCorps members who work tirelessly to strengthen Michigan communities.

The governor’s proposed budget also includes another big hit to nonprofits: the elimination of charitable tax credits. This proposed tax plan, which includes this budget cut, just passed the House by a slim margin and will move to the Senate for a vote. The state’s potentially small gain in revenue (less than $50 million/year) will be dwarfed by the negative impact of denying nonprofits of the leverage they need to multiply and diversify their donations through individual giving tax credits. Without providing encouragement for donations, Michigan’s nonprofit sector will see less charitable giving, further straining their efforts to assist and develop Michigan communities.

With these devastating proposals looming, organizations and individuals throughout the state need to tell their legislators they oppose these budget changes that will negatively affect the nonprofit community. Decreasing nonprofits’ capacity to serve communities is not the answer to the budget problems in our state.

Michigan Nonprofit Association is spearheading the effort to get organizations and individuals to sign-on to two separate letters – one opposing the elimination of charitable tax credits and the other to oppose the elimination of funding for MCSC. You can view both letters, and sign on to them, by visiting http://www.mnaonline.org/proposedbudgetcuts.aspx.

Undermining the nonprofit sector is not a successful strategy for the state’s budget. We encourage you to sign-on the letters to tell our lawmakers to oppose the elimination of charitable tax credits and the zeroing out of MCSC funding!

Submitted by Katie VanderVeen, Public Policy Fellow for Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

There is Danger in Not Raising Our Voice

As nonprofit leaders we live by the old farmer’s adage of, “Fix it up, use it up, wear it out, or do without.” Our adoption of this philosophy is what empowers nonprofits to gain trust and develop partnerships that further our mission. It works well, except in one area—expressing our voice.

Nonprofit voice is shorthand for our sector’s role in sharing what it knows, speaking for those unable to express their needs, and informing and influencing decision makers so that they do the right thing. In short, our voice is our right and responsibility to exercise our political capital for the common good. Yet it is often too hard to express our voice with so many pressures bearing down on our organizations, our work and our constituents.

Given all these pressures, we have to examine how we use our voice. Some might argue that like elected officials, we need to look at our voice as political capital—a resource we spend thriftily and only when absolutely necessary. In this case we might look at the Governor’s proposal to eliminate charitable giving incentives as $50 million that we could offer up as sacrifice to gain government goodwill. In other words, we shouldn’t expend our capital on this matter when so many other larger issues could come up later. Several sector leaders have come to me with this very concern. They worry that if they shout now, they won’t be heard later. Or they worry that they could jeopardize their friendly relationship with their elected officials.

These concerns are certainly understandable, but extremely dangerous. Here’s why.

First, nonprofit voice, unlike our own vocal chords, is a muscle that only works if exercised. Granted you want to be sure that you pick your battles. However, in my 15 plus years of experience in government/nonprofit interactions, I have never witnessed an elected or unelected government official respect and support an organization that stayed quiet during a hard political decision. Granted, some have been burned when they have handled their advocacy improperly and did not follow the rules, but there are none that I can think of that are respected for their complete silence. I know that some will dispute my conclusion on this, so I’ll explain why in my next point.

Second, the depth and length of the memory of goodwill in our political system is directly proportional to our term limits. No elected official today in Michigan has to worry about the long-term (15-20 years) consequences of their actions. Term limits guarantee that they will not be in office when the day of reckoning comes for their decisions. In addition, our state political bodies are largely controlled by the leadership rather than the caucuses. Large decisions are made by roughly six leaders in the House and Senate and the Governor. All the rest are waiting for direction and support.

Third, nonprofits have the privilege and responsibility to advocate for those unable to speak for themselves. This characteristic cuts across all 501(c)(3) nonprofits—we are charted with a charitable purpose to serve the common good. We are also constrained to be nonpartisan in our expression of voice. This makes for a power combination of benevolence and neutrality as we address Michigan’s most challenging issues. We all have to hold up these powerful characteristics whether a community foundation or a college, whether a food pantry or a hospital, whether a museum or a child daycare center, whether a senior living center or a land conservancy, we all have the responsibility and privilege to exercise our voice and advocate for the issues important to our constituents and the sector.

MNA recognizes that this is hard work and that little support exists to underwrite the time, talent and treasure it takes to advocate appropriately and effectively. That is why we give you the tools you need to make it easier and integrate it into your daily activities. Be sure to check out our website for our public policy & advocacy tools as well as our nonprofit resources that help you stay legal and ensure that your organization can effectively and legally share its voice. MNA has a platform you can use for your own organization to give a framework to your advocacy. You can also participate in our events including the Nonprofit SuperConference where we will be joined by Governor Rick Snyder. Finally, be sure to sign up for our Advocacy Alerts. These will give you the most current information on how you can exercise your voice.

Nonprofit leaders must advocate for their missions and the people they serve. Our organizations have to exercise our voice to be heard, understood and respected. I hope you will exercise your voice as a nonprofit leader and help elected officials make the right choices in these challenging and transformative times


Submitted by Kyle Caldwell, president and CEO, for the Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

Draw the Line

The data is out and the direction is clear, Michigan is losing population at an alarming rate. We are smaller, with Flint down 18%, Detroit down 25% (the largest non-natural disaster caused drop of any city above 100,000-ever), Grand Rapids down 5%, and even booming Ann Arbor was down. Only small rural communities in the UP and other northern Michigan regions saw any growth.

Despite a large turnout of early respondents and hosting the top early reporting city in the country, Michigan’s Census count shows a huge population shift. With that shift come very serious consequences including a drop in federal funding and loss of congressional representation.

A consequence we often overlook is the role of Census data in redistricting—the lines drawn for politicians to represent our interests and communities. With the release of the final Census numbers, the clock is now ticking for congressional, state and county redistricting. How much input will you have in determining who represents you in Congress, the Michigan Legislature and County Commissions? The answer is very little if we repeat the mistakes of the past.

Redistricting, a process that takes place just once every 10 years, can keep our communities together or split them apart—changing whether we have representatives who feel responsible for our concerns.

Instead of drawing districts that accurately represent our communities, in many cases the parties engaged will put their own interests first – creating “safe districts.” This is something both parties do frequently, giving undue power to political insiders, lobbyists and PACs. It needs to stop.

This is not a Republican or Democrat issue. It’s a Michigan issue. Michigan’s weak redistricting laws are unacceptable and an embarrassment. As long as there are similar numbers of people in each district, lawmakers have nearly free reign to draw lines as they see fit – and that usually means that districts are solidly held by one party and voters have little meaningful choice on Election Day. Voters’ voices are being lost and their choices limited.

MNA is leading a coalition of organizations interested in ensuring Michigan citizens have an open and transparent redistricting process. Be sure to check out www.drawthelinemichigan.org and see how your nonprofit can help ensure that Michigan voters pick their representatives and not the other way around.

Submitted by Kyle Caldwell, president and CEO, for the Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

A Budget Challenge on Three Fronts

Is Michigan a Nonprofit-friendly state and why does it matter? This is our sector’s most important question as we face a three-front fiscal crisis. The three fronts are the budget shortfalls at the federal, state and local levels; challenges in government contracting and granting; and skyrocketing need levels that have not been seen for some time.

Michigan’s current projected budget gap for FY 2012 is $1.8 billion, placing us in the top 20% of the 45 states projecting shortfalls. The Recovery Act Funds are drying up now with the reduction of the $98 billion invested from FY 2009 to FY 2011 to a projected $6 billion for FY 2012. The U.S. Senate is debating on whether to cut $4.7 billion or $57 billion from the current budget for the remaining six plus months of this fiscal year. That debate is largely seen as setting the stage for how the FY 2012 debate will be waged as the Congress and President declare each others’ budget as unrealistic. These budget challenges combined with the stresses placed on nonprofits through the proposed repeals of Michigan tax credits make the public/private partnerships difficult for nonprofits to continue.

An increasing number of nonprofit organizations with federal, state, and local contracts report a strained government partnership. Some report that governments are failing to make payments for services performed under contracts, forcing the organizations to make painful cuts to programs, services and staff. In light of the budget cuts in revenue sharing and other public sources, local government agencies are withholding reimbursements, rescinding agreements altogether, or imposing other financial burdens that harm nonprofits. This challenging relationship is exacerbated by the fact that generally government contracts simply don’t cover the full cost of providing services. This is proven in our own look at the Michigan landscape.

MNA data reveals that 45% of nonprofits experience delays in scheduled government payments. In addition, when organizations were asked to identify specifically where the delay in government funding was occurring: 39% reported delays at the local level, 26% reported delays at the state level, and 16% reported delays at the federal level. We also found that 49% reported raising less financial/in-kind support in 2009 compared to previous years. Beyond budget cuts, nonprofits struggle to provide vitally needed services to a growing population with more constraints and few resources.

The final conspirator is the growing levels of need. Let’s agree to set aside for the moment the effects of the recession including the job loss, record foreclosure rates, and persistently high unemployment rates. There are other huge issues including the unpaid pension and healthcare liabilities on the state’s books. Michigan has a growing need with the aging of the Baby Boomers and the now projected decline—not stagnation, but decline—of population growth and thereby working taxpayers. While Michigan’s 1.9 million who depend on Medicaid are spared the budget axe in Governor’s Snyder’s FY 2012-2013 budget proposal, they are still expected to grow in numbers at an alarming rate that may exceed our ability to provide them healthcare coverage. This will lead to more elderly, children and vulnerable populations looking for help elsewhere, especially local mission-driven nonprofits concerned with the health of our communities.

These are reasons we should care. As a sector, we should begin to call for policy makers to build a fertile landscape for an effective, engaged, relevant and understood nonprofit sector. We need to demand that the state’s policy climate be supportive of the sector that is one of the leading economic engines, employs one in ten workers, and includes the assets our state will need to lead to our economic transformation—education, healthcare, arts & culture, and environmental stewardship. These are the reasons that every Michigander needs to call for Michigan to be a nonprofit-friendly state. It’s what will be at the forefront of our reinvention.


Submitted by Kyle Caldwell, president and CEO, for the Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

SuperConference 2011, Not Your Ordinary Workshops

This year the SuperConference planning committee has hand selected presenters for the 30+ workshops that will be taking place at SuperConference on May 10th and 11th. Presenters include speakers from our plenary sessions as well as speakers from across the U.S. Not only that, workshops are divided into six topic-based tracks that appeal to those at both an intermediate and advanced level.

Below, is a sneak peek at some of the workshops and presenters from each track that are being featured this year.

Planned Giving Strategies to Meet Donor Expectations and Current Funding Goals
Advanced Fund Development Course
Facilitated By: Christopher L. Kelly, Vice President/Senior Philanthropic Advisor – Comerica Charitable Services Group

“Opportunities and Options” are the requirement of today’s donor. Our donors would like to see multiple ways to meet current gifting goals for their beloved organization, as well as paths toward leaving a lasting legacy. In this workshop we will discuss various planned giving vehicles; how they function traditionally, but more importantly, how they can function to meet the challenges presented by today’s sophisticated donor base. The result will provide opportunities for donors to gift from their accumulated wealth, rather than their disposable income, which translates into potentially larger and concrete financial commitments, and the opportunity to generate new relationships with the next generations of your current donor base.

The Game Plan
Intermediate Public Policy and Advocacy Course
Facilitated By: Abby Levine, Legal Director of Advocacy Programs – Alliance for Justice.

This interactive session helps organizations strategize how best to employ the advocacy tools at their disposal. It includes a discussion of advocacy fundamentals that help participants define their goals and objectives, appropriate targets, and effective advocacy tools, as well as assessing advocacy capacity and evaluating advocacy activities and planning for future campaigns.

Communications & Collaborations
Cross Track Communication Course
Facilitated By: David Stillman and Debra (Fiterman) Arbit, BridgeWorks

Join our Keynote Speakers, David & Debra, as they take you on a deeper dive of working through generational issues to keep your organization relevant in today’s changing world!

Five Crazy Habits
Intermediate Governance/Professional Development Course
Facilitated By: Robin Lynn Grinnell, Program Officer – Cook Family Foundation

Is your board agenda chock full of lengthy (ugh) program reports? Are you stuck in a perpetual cycle of fundraising events that are “just fine”? Do you sometimes sit at your desk and wonder if your board and/or staff will ever really get it together? If you answered ‘yes’ to any (or all) of these questions, don’t dismay… Many nonprofits have adopted Five Crazy Habits that simply trip us up. None of them are blatantly obvious and they’re certainly not illegal – they just make our work harder. Join us for a fast-paced session in which we’ll laugh (and groan) at our collective goofs and we’ll share some simple fixes that – with a little dedication – will get you back on the right path!

Google Grant & Apps!
Cross Track Planning Course
Facilitated By: Elyse Guilfoyle, AdWords Account Strategist – Google, Mary Elizabeth Ulliman, AdWords Account Manager – Google, and Jon Fraiser, Google

You are changing the world, and we want to help! Google employees from the Ann Arbor office will introduce you to Google’s free product offerings for nonprofits. They will touch on a wide variety of products that can help you: Reach and engage your supporters, improve your organization’s operations, Raise awareness for your cause .This session will focus specifically on the Google Grants program and Google Apps for Nonprofits. The Google Grants program empowers select nonprofit organizations to achieve their goals by helping them promote their websites via advertising on Google.com. As a Google Grants recipient, your organization can solicit donations, recruit volunteers, promote events and programs, and much more through Google Grants ads.

Catch the Spirit of Service
Intermediate Civic Engagement Course
Facilitated By: Jeanine Yard, Program Officer – Michigan Community Service Commission and Evan Albert, State Program Director – Corporation for National & Community Service

Is your organization interested in making connections with National Service programs such as AmeriCorps, Senior Corps, and Learn and Serve? Do you wonder what a strong national service program looks like and how you might become that strong program effectively utilizing national service members. Join us for this interactive workshop and get answers to all your National Service questions. Learn how to ready your organization to apply for a grant or to host a member, identify opportunities for collaboration with other service programs, and find out how national service can add value to your organization.

For more information on SuperConference 2011, the workshops, keynote speakers, and other conference features, visit www.MNAonline.org/superconference.aspx .

Submitted by Ashley Branoff, Communications Coordinator for Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

Governor Proposes Changes that Affect Nonprofits

Governor Rick Snyder unveiled a bold and politically charged budget proposal last week. The proposal calls for a flat income or profit tax on businesses (in place of the MBT), taxing of pensions, elimination of the homestead provisions, and a myriad of cuts to social services and education programs and institutions. Governor Snyder’s budget also included the rolling back of decades work to make Michigan one of the nation’s most Nonprofit Friendly States. Michigan has a proud tradition of giving and volunteering:

• nearly half of all citizens volunteer,
• 85% donate financially to nonprofits,
• nearly 90% see charities as important to the quality of life in Michigan,
• 93% say the need for nonprofits is greater today than in the past, and
• nine out of ten believe that charities should retain their tax exemptions.

Over the past three years as our state’s manufacturing, retail, and government sectors have struggled and declined, only one sector was hiring and growing–the nonprofit sector.

• One in ten workers in Michigan is employed by a nonprofit.
• During the recession, employment in the nonprofit sector grew by 14%.
• Wages increased among workers in the nonprofit sector by 2.7%.

While growing, the sector has not been able to meet the overwhelming demand for services brought on by persistently high unemployment, record levels of foreclosures, stalled business investment, and tight money markets. Individual giving is especially challenging to maintain in a climate of constrained discretionary income levels. Nonprofits are also working to deal with the challenges of government where payments are late and fail to cover the full costs of services provided.

Given this growth, our state’s long tradition of public/private partnerships, the tools we’ve developed to encourage growth in individual philanthropy, and the challenges of government grants and contracts, it is difficult to understand the rationale behind the Governor’s budget choices.

In addition to the tax changes for seniors and businesses, the Governor proposed 15%+ cuts to the 15 public 4-yr. higher education institutions, over $400 per pupil cuts in K-12 funding, the budget calls for the all out elimination of the majority of the charitable incentive tools Michigan nonprofits use to support vital services to Michigan residents. They include:

• Earned income tax credit (a Michigan companion to the national credit) – $353.8 million
• Gifts: public art, radio, colleges, universities, archives, museums, libraries credit – $24.8 million
• Community foundations, $3.4 million
• Food banks and homeless shelters credit – $21 million
• College tuition and fees credit – $4.8 million
• Automobile donation credit – $100,000
• Energy efficient home improvement credit – (figures not available)
• Historic preservation credit – (figures not available)

In just the areas we can calculate right now, the nonprofit sector will be taxed a total of $54.1 millionin this budget year alone. This excludes the energy credit, preservation credit, both of which go to support areas in which nonprofits are essentially the only service providers, and also leaves out the Earned Income Tax Credit ($353.8 m) which goes to the individuals only nonprofits, in partnership with government, serve – the working poor. It also omits any local government financial challenges that will be thrust upon nonprofits as revenue sharing is cut nearly in half in the Governor’s budget. And, of course this calculation omits the loss of leveraging power nonprofits will suffer when Michigan donors realize our state tax credits as incentives to give are gone (with the exception of a few targeted for veterans and special needs children).

The Governor and members of the legislature have difficult choices to make. Michigan’s structural deficit has long been the can kicked down the road and the end of the road is here. Michigan’s nonprofit sector will be called upon to make sacrifices for our future financial security. No one should operate under the illusion that they will be spared the budget axe during this important time in our state. As a sector, we need to decide if Governor Synder’s proposal properly defines the sacrifices we want to make or if there are more sustainable and ultimately healthier choices we can make to help in Michigan’s economic recovery.


Submitted by Kyle Caldwell, president and CEO, for the Michigan Nonprofit Association.

add to del.icio.us    add to blinkslist    add to furl    digg this    add to ma.gnolia    stumble it!    add to simpy    seed the vine    add to reddit    add to fark    tailrank this    post to facebook

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,383 other followers